dDA's Rant: The End of the Forgotten Realms? PDF Print E-mail
User Rating: / 2
PoorBest 
Written by dDemonicAngels   
Saturday, 19 January 2008

The end of the Forgotten Realms?

For those of you haven't been following the updates to the Forgotten Realms for the 4th edition, many changes are planned that will please some people but annoy and aggravate the majority of faithful fans. I think I'm one of latter who doesn't like what I see.

Below is the teaser excerpt from the online Dragon that was just released January 11th at D&D Insider that leads to a detailed description of the changes:

Countdown to the Realms
Year of the Ageless One
Cities burned, kingdoms fell, luckless people were changed into monsters, and mages went berserk. This was the Spellplague, a rippling outbreak of hundreds, perhaps thousands, of magical catastrophes that left no corner of Faerûn untouched.

Click here to see what's got dDA upset now.

The New Forgotten Realms
When WotC produced the new Forgotten Realms sourcebook for the 3rd edition of D&D, they incorpated the updates from the Times of Trouble that rocked the Reams.  Some gods died while others changed. The storyline was one of the ways used to justify how the 3e changes came to be. This smoothed the way for new stats, powers and magic.

So now with the 4th edition being introduced, WotC has created the Spellplague storyline which will be used in the same way to explain the differences. The new Forgotten Realms jumps 94 years into the future and describes what has happened during that time. For the complete story, read the full story Dragon article here at www.wizards.com/default.asp.

News about the Spellplague isn't just recent, only the fine details that were just released. Basically, the Nethril Empire has returned to its original place in the Anauroch Desert, its people ruled by a "noble caste of shades" under the "dominion of shadow". It's not clear that this is what causes the Spellplague but it is a good possibility. Change occurs all across Faerun caused by magical storms. Jeremy E Grenemyer summarized the changes:

Baldur's Gate stands as the largest city in Faerûn, for its willingness to take refugees during the Spellplague.

Where the Landrise stood, a miles-wide pit now exists.

Thay's plateaus are thousands of feet higher up now.

The Spellplague was marginally resisted by areas with persistent magical wards, such as Mythals.

Where Sespech and Chondath once stood, the Changelands now exists: an area of active Spellplague that did not go away as time progressed.

Waterdeep stands as before, though its walking statues wrecked much ere they stopped after a day's worth of destruction. The Lords of Waterdeep exist, with the Blackstaff advising them still.

Sembia stands as the crown jewel in the Empire of Nethril. The sands of Netheril are slowly being taken over by water and vegetation, as the lords of Netheril spend much time to erase what the Phaerimm wrought.

Cormyr controls the former Sembian cities of Daerlun and Urmlaspyr, has battled the Empire of Netheril to retain its borders and has alligned itself with the Dalelands and Myth Drannor. King Foril, Grandson of Azoun V, sits upon the throne.

Where Unther stood, Tymanther, Land of the Dragon Warriors exists.

Things Will Never Be the Same
It was made clear early on by WotC that it would not be possible to convert your current FR campaign to 4E, but few people realized the why and the how. It's clear that the Realms have changed in a major way and its population is dealing with the effects of the Spellplague, past and present. It effectively has created a new slant to all storylines that must address the changes and current dangers. It is obvious that most of the characters in your current campaign will be dead and buried 94 years later.

Change is a Good Thing
Change doesn't have to be all bad. I was actually looking forward to the new release of the Campaign book. Updated storylines in the source book provide me with fresh ideas for my campaign. I can follow them or not and even ignore completely the new changes. I like the idea of evolving stories that may affect me.

At any given time, I'm usually only playing in one little corner of the Realms. So if a new story updates Cormyr, it has no impact on my adventures in Thay. And when we do return to Cormyr, maybe I want to incorporate the changes and maybe I won't.

Change is a Bad Thing
The problem with the Spellplague is that it is widespread and affects all of Faerun. It's not just the rise of a new super-villain in one city in one country, it's everywhere. I can't ignore these changes. Any future storytelling about the Realms will now continue from this disaster point on. All modules from WotC will probably investigate the cause of the Spellplague leaving other storylines by the wayside. Heck, they've already jumped 94 years into the future so any stories I was following have long been resolved.

The SpellPlague Decision
Don't get me wrong, I think the Spellplague is a fascinating story and can produce many interesting adventure. But to me it would be a campaign arc to be resolved, not a permanent, underlying condition to a whole world. I mean a whole new campaign setting world could have been set around this premise.

I feel like the Forgotten Realms has ended for me. I will continue to use the Realms the way they were and incorporate ideas into them as I decide. I will probably even use the Spellplague idea somewhere in my story for a localized area. But I'm guessing that this is where WotC and I part company about my favorite setting.

Someone on the Forgotten Realms forums described this update as an evil, parallel universe that has similar names to Faerun. The hope is that WotC comes to its senses and returns to the original Realms for 5E. Me, I`m hoping that someone steps out of the shower and we discover it was all a dream.


 

dDemonicAngels is the online identity of Bil White, a freelance writer living in Montreal. The Forgotten Realms has been the home for his campaign settings from day one so he has a long history with Faerun.


Views: 422

  Comments (3)
 1 Written by Feytharn, on 24-01-2008 10:14
Well, at least it is going to be cheaper for me - while I will probably buy the campaign setting for 4th. ed. (perhaps ist is at least a good read) my realsm campaign may go on for years without using all the 3rd. ed. material - not speaking of the netbooks published at candlekeep. com. So 94 Years to fill aren't neccesarily bad news. (p.s. The changes brought by the times of trouble were covered in the Forgotten Realms Adventures Hardcover well during 2nd. Edition - and they brought the changes from 1st to 2nd ed. into the realms.)
 2 Written by forumLurker, on 21-01-2008 00:49
"...many changes are planned that will please some people..." -- Where? Where the heck are these? Most of the changes just seem to annoy everybody, or at best are treated with indifference and apathy. 
 
Also: "When WotC introduced the 3rd edition of D&D, they also introduced the Times of Trouble storyline..." The Time of Troubles was the transition between the Forgotten Realms Adventures hardcover at the very beginning of Second Edition AD&D and the Forgotten Realms box set a few years later, also Second Edition AD&D. It was around well before 3e, and has been pissing off Realms fans for many generations. 
 
Other than the two nitpicks (partially contributed by my moonlighting at the local gaming store), I agree that the Spellplague is an interesting idea, but I'd rather see it in its own setting as opposed to one with such vibrant and detailed history as the Realms. Not that I'm a huge fan of the Realms, but I like it enough that I'd like it to stay as it is. 
 
Aegean-- I'm kind of in the same boat. I went from 2e AD&D to 3.5 D&D, after being mildly annoyed at 3.0 for a number of reasons, so now I feel kind of stabbed in the back--all those 3.5 books I picked up in the last two years are no longer being supported, rendered obsolete. This feeling gets rammed home whenever I read Bill Slavicsek or other WotC writers tell me how "broken" and "bad" 3.5 is--all those books they wrote and published--and how 4e will fix all their issues... 
 
Still, when I stop and think about it, the rules are still good, and having yet another out-of-print game I play isn't a bad thing, especially since 3.5 is a damn fine system. (Honestly, at this point, the only games I run that are still in print are Exalted and Savage Worlds... plus, now I can complete my 3.5 collection for pennies on the dollar!)
 3 Written by aegean, on 19-01-2008 13:00
I agree - it really hacks me off - it took me a long time to get my head around v3.0 as I don't get to play that often - But I came to really enjoy it - plus the ease of cross platform genre (stop screaming GURPS - D&D is D&D if you get my drift) 
 
THEN they brought out v3.5 which was so close it just befuddled me, and now to bring out v4.0 is hacking me off, but as some mentioned somewhere on a forum or even in a Dragon mag itself 
 
WotC really stands for Wizards of the COST, people (including myself - until my self exile to a D&D unfriendly country - they just don't really play it) have over time spent a hell of a lot of cash - and other than possibly the core books I doubt I will be purchasing much. 
 
Although one of the things that will truely annoy me is that I have been trying to map Sundabar for a long time - even now in 3D! 
 
OMG - a mini rant :p

Only registered users can write comments.
Please login or register.

Powered by AkoComment Tweaked Special Edition v.1.4.6
AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com
All right reserved

Last Updated ( Monday, 21 January 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >

All content copyright greytale.com and Greg Taylor. Written content and graphics for personal use only except where noted.
Additional items credited to an individual or organization are the copyright of their respective owner.
Home